Here is the conclusion to 63 year old male CC: Chest pain.
Let’s take another look at the patient’s heart rhythm.
I can see why some of you thought this was Torsades de Pointes but the cycle rate is over 300 and the underlying rhythm showed a normal QTc. In my experience it’s not unusual for the onset of VF to be relatively slow and then accelerate (sometimes with a cyclic rate over 700).
I feel confident this is course VF. Either way, it was pulseless.
The paramedic in charge of the call shocked the patient at 200 J.
Here is a 12-lead ECG of the post-shock rhythm.
I find it interesting that the limb leads become non-diagnostic during accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR).
Several minutes and later the rhythm had stabilized.
The patient was delivered to a PCI-hospital where the interventional cardiologist was waiting.
Here is the 12-lead ECG captured prior to the procedure.
Here is the post-cath 12-lead ECG taken after successful stenting of the LCX.
These are the days that make it all worth while! Thanks for sharing the case, Phil!




























good case and looks like a good conclusion!
Now one question I have is – on the pre-PCI 12 lead it shows ST depression V1-3 (?posterior) and some elevation in the inferior leads with reciprocal changes, if I remember my cardiac physiology right, aren’t these areas fed by the R coronary artery?
Obviously I defer to the cardiologist and the vastly improved ECG!
Ben, I too was thinking RCA given STE III>II w/ posterior involvement (yet we have V5-V6 STE). Most folks are right dominant (PDA supplied by RCA). Tom has a great post which covers the algorithm for culprit artery in inferior MI’s.
Perhaps this is a big LCX?
Hey Ben, if the patient had a left dominent system, the LCX will supply the Posterior and approx 40% of the inferior L Ventricle. A left dominent system is found in roughly 10% of cases. The other 90% will indeed have these systems supplied by the RCA.
Thanks Phil that clears it up
Hey Tom, do you have any numbers on M&M for LCX occlusions?
Brandon O -
No I don’t, but I’d be skeptical of any numbers, because STEMI in the distribution of the circumflex artery is under-reported. It seems likely that many are misclassified as NSTEMI.
Tom
Remember this thread at the EKG Club?
http://health.dir.groups.yahoo.com/group/ekg_club/message/13018
Tom
Yep. I’ll keep my ears peeled for any more numbers, it’s an interesting dark area.
i wish we had the 4th line on the tracing, the monitor lead. it certainly is useful.